In the early 2000s, Boulder County began implementing sustainability-focused policies that laid the foundation for modern climate initiatives. Programs such as the Keep It Clean Partnership (KICP) and the Boulder Valley Comprehensive Plan (BVCP) were developed to promote water conservation and sustainable land use. The county also introduced zero waste policies and renewable energy incentives, aiming to transition away from fossil fuels. While these early initiatives were progressive for their time, they primarily focused on incremental improvements rather than transformative change.

Over the past decade, Boulder County has increased its focus on climate action, renewable energy adoption, and stricter environmental regulations. Some of the most notable advancements include the following:

• Implementation of several key environmental policies over the years to address climate change and promote sustainability. One of the most significant initiatives was the Climate Action Plan Tax, introduced in 2006. As the first tax of its kind in the United States, the county has played a crucial role in funding renewable energy projects and energy efficiency initiatives, helping to reduce the county’s carbon footprint.
• In 2018, Boulder County committed to reducing greenhouse gas emissions by 45% by 2030 and achieving a 90% reduction by 2050. These ambitious targets aim to transition the county toward a net-zero emissions future by relying on cleaner energy sources and more sustainable community practices.
• In 2020, Boulder County strengthened its environmental policies by adopting one of the strictest oil and gas setback laws in Colorado. This law limits fossil fuel extraction near homes, schools, and community areas.
• The county has also taken steps to expand renewable energy programs, actively promoting the use of solar, wind, and geothermal energy to transition away from fossil fuels.
• Boulder County has invested in transportation initiatives designed to reduce car dependency, such as expanding bike lanes and improving public transit options.
• Boulder County is home to non-profits such as Resource Central, which encourages residents to adopt responsible water usage habits in response to increasing drought risks.

While these policies demonstrate a commitment to sustainability, many rely on long-term planning rather than immediate action. Given the accelerating climate crisis, there is growing concern that Boulder County’s efforts are not keeping pace with the urgency of the problem.

The stark reality is that despite Boulder County’s ambitious sustainability goals, progress remains slow, and the region continues to experience climate change-induced challenges such as wildfires, extreme heat, and declining air quality.

Alternatives to oil and gas

While the county has made strides in restricting new oil and gas drilling, 73 wells remain active, and more than 100 additional wells exist in the eastern part of the county. The county has pursued legal action against major oil companies, but legal battles take years to resolve, delaying meaningful impact.

To truly mediate the effects of climate change, policymakers should enact an immediate phase-out plan for remaining oil wells rather than waiting for natural depletion. For too long, politicians have taken money from big oil companies while overlooking environmental violations that directly affect their constituents.

Boulder County has promoted solar, wind, and geothermal energy, yet high installation costs prevent widespread adoption. Additionally, while the county has set emissions reduction targets, these rely on statewide clean energy transitions rather than Boulder-specific solutions.

Additional policies to increase solar power implementation include:

• Subsidies or rebates for low-income residents to install solar panels.
• Fast-tracking community solar projects that allow residents to share renewable energy resources.
• Mandating solar installations on all new buildings to accelerate adoption.

Limited accessibility to going green is one of the major hurdles for rural communities’ efforts to switch to sustainable energy sources. Despite investments in bike lanes and public transportation, Boulder County remains heavily car-dependent, contributing to high emissions. Public transit options remain limited, particularly in less urbanized areas.

Most notably, electric vehicle (EV) charging networks can be limited outside of metropolitan cities, and charging is slow. It sometimes takes upwards of 40 to 50 hours for a fully electric vehicle to reach a full battery and between 5 and 6 hours for a plug-in hybrid. Boulder County has a total of 538 charging stations, 44 of which are fast chargers.

Beyond EVs, public transportation is an alternative to personal car use. However, major improvements in the state’s public transportation system would make it a more viable alternative to driving. Subsidies in RTD passes and the implementation of congestion pricing or low-emission zones could further discourage excessive car use.

BOCO’s changing climate

With rising temperatures and diminishing snowpack, Boulder County is at risk of water shortages in the coming decades. While programs like Resource Central promote conservation, there are no strict regulations on excessive water use.

The Marshall Fire, which destroyed over 1,000 structures, was a clear warning sign that climate change is making wildfires more frequent and intense. Boulder County only began monitoring its stormwater after the fire in 2021. Additionally, air quality continues to deteriorate due to smoke pollution from regional wildfires continues to deteriorate air quality.

Historically, native land stewards recognized the importance of techniques such as controlled burns and reforestation. Some environmentalists have suggested returning the protection of our parks and forests to native tribes who have extensive knowledge and centuries of ancestral traditions of sustainable land stewardship.

Further regulations than those already in place on builders and contractors who construct new homes and buildings in the region should ensure that structures are built to reduce the risk of fire damage. The eastern part of the county had few significant wildfire events until the Marshall Fire, leading the county to update its building fire code. Now, ignition resistance building materials are required in Wildfire Zone 2 as well.

Green policies, red tape

Political and bureaucratic delays cause many environmental policies to require extensive planning, public hearings, and legal battles before implementation. A lack of federal funding results in economic constraints. Renewable energy projects, public transit expansions, and water conservation programs require significant financial investment. Other challenges include public resistance, as some sustainability initiatives face pushback from businesses and residents who fear economic or lifestyle disruptions.

Boulder County must move beyond planning and take immediate, decisive action to truly impact climate change. One of the most urgent steps is to enforce a clear timeline for phasing out oil and gas operations, ensuring a structured transition away from fossil fuels. Simultaneously, the county should mandate solar panel installations on all new residential and commercial buildings, accelerating the shift toward renewable energy.

To make sustainability accessible to all residents, it is crucial to subsidize sustainable energy solutions for low-income households, removing financial barriers to adoption. Additionally, Boulder County must expand public transportation options and invest in electrification, reducing reliance on personal vehicles and cutting transportation emissions.

With water scarcity becoming an increasing threat, strict water conservation measures should be enforced before a crisis arises, ensuring long-term resource sustainability.

Lastly, as wildfires continue to devastate the region, strengthening wildfire mitigation strategies — such as controlled burns, improved forest management, and home-hardening programs — should be a top priority to protect both communities and ecosystems. By implementing these urgent measures, Boulder County can transform its climate commitments into tangible, lasting change.

Boulder County has made commendable progress in sustainability, but progress alone is not enough when faced with the urgent reality of climate change. The slow pace of action continued reliance on fossil fuels, and gaps in renewable energy access highlight the need for more aggressive policies and faster implementation.

Simply put, climate change is accelerating faster than Boulder County’s sustainability efforts. If Boulder truly wants to be a leader in climate action, it must transition from planning to immediate, large-scale implementation — before it’s too late.

Residents can reduce car use, switch to renewable energy, conserve water, and support local climate policies. While individual acts can certainly make a local impact, the largest contributors to climate change continue to be the oil and gas industry. Oil and gas drilling, rising water demand, transportation emissions, and wildfire threats are the most pressing challenges BOCO faces for the next 25 years. The question now is: Are the residents of one of the most naturally beautiful places in the country willing to take radical action against corporate giants in order to protect the land they live on?

Like journalism like this? Consider becoming a sustaining supporter (and get our printed copy monthly at home.)
Democracy needs journalism more than ever. We’ve been telling the truth for 24 years. Your support helps us keep telling it for at least the next four years.

Democracy needs journalism more than ever. We’ve been telling the truth for 24 years. Your support helps us keep telling it for at least the next four years.

The post Going Green: How Much Has BOCO Improved in 25 Years? appeared first on Yellow Scene Magazine.

Has “sustainability” become an eye-rolling buzzword that’s tossed around boardrooms and shoehorned into public policy as an afterthought?

Communities in Boulder County and their leaders are banking against that cynicism — but what do we mean by the term “sustainability”? At its core, when it comes to ecological sustainability, we’re talking about survival. Too dramatic? We mean the ability of communities, organizations, and individuals to behave in a manner that protects and maintains our ecosystems for current and future generations of human beings. No ecosystem means no humans.

Small towns and cities across the country are looking for ways to strengthen and diversify their economies, attract residents, build lasting infrastructure, and ensure resiliency against future climate events. Especially in areas highly dependent on tourism — like Boulder County — they also want to maintain their distinct identities and not lose what makes each place unique to visitors and residents alike.

Colorado is experiencing an alarming increase in climate change-related events — severe and devastating droughts, wildfires, and flooding are becoming more frequent and costly. The oil and gas industry, especially fracking operations, are major contributors to methane pollution. Cutting methane emissions from oil and gas, according to the David Suzuki Foundation, is one of the cheapest and easiest ways to address climate change.

At its core, when it comes to ecological sustainability, we’re talking about survival.

In response to these challenges, the state has set ambitious sustainability goals. In 2019, Governor Polis signed an executive order to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by at least 50% by 2030 and 90% by 2050. The state has also set targets to increase renewable energy production, improve energy efficiency, and reduce waste.

While these goals are commendable, achieving them will require a concerted effort from all communities in the state, including smaller towns and cities. With smaller revenues and tax bases than larger centers, is there any way to balance urgent economic needs with ecological preservation at a municipal scale?

Erie’s challenge

Many communities have developed detailed sustainability strategies to address these increasingly complex challenges. Erie has established a Sustainability Advisory Board to advise the town’s board of trustees on “matters that relate to the planning, development, maintenance, and management of sustainability activities throughout Erie.”

According to Alissa Kuzmich, a member of the Erie Sustainability Advisory Board, the town is experiencing a period of growth yet still has a very strong community feel. “We recently had a Hope & Gratitude Project,” she told Yellow Scene. “It was in the old town called Briggs, the main street that the old town is on. School children filled the streets with luminaries talking about what they were hopeful for.”

Many communities have developed detailed sustainability strategies to address these increasingly complex challenges.

The Sustainability Division partnered with the Erie’s Tree Advisory Board and the Parks and Recreation Department to hold an Arbor Day/Earth Day Celebration event. It brought in exhibitors related to horticulture, tree management, the solar industry, and electric vehicles — the latter hosted by Drive Electric Colorado. “There’s no pressure for purchase,” said Kuzmich. Instead, at this event people have the opportunity to ask questions without a sales pitch. This year the event is planned for April 29th.

“One of the things that’s happening right now that’s pretty cool is called Elevate Erie — it’s a comprehensive plan. It sets the vision for the next five years,” Kuzmich told YS. “With all the growth we’ve had, sustainability was invited to be part of that conversation.” The board gives input on Erie’s development, along with members of many other organizations, to ensure equitable representation across the community.

The town also has a noble goal to become a zero waste community. The concept of zero waste aims to minimize environmental impacts throughout the entire lifecycle of a product — beyond recycling and composting — to include design, use, and material management. Erie plans to increase access to recycling and composting while reducing waste that ends up in its landfill. The town claims that recycling and composting are some of the most effective ways to reduce “consumption emissions.’.

Nederland: Small but mighty

Nederland, aka “Ned,” is just west of Boulder with a population less than 1,500. The town attracts tourists with its picturesque scenery, fishing, skiing, cycling, camping, shops, boutiques, and even a vibrant music scene. YS spoke with Sustainability Coordinator Leah Haney who is relatively new to the role. Haney executes the Sustainability Advisory Board’s goals for renewable energy and zero waste by 2025. The board acts as a partner with Boulder County, the state of Colorado, and the local business community to determine resource availability and align these with the needs and wants of residents. The partners “make collective decisions,” said Haney, “coming from and guided by Boulder County’s requirements and what we’ve set for ourselves locally.”

The town attracts tourists with its picturesque scenery, fishing, skiing, cycling, camping, shops, boutiques, and even a vibrant music scene.

One of the initiatives Haney is particularly proud of is Nederland’s Construction & Demolition Debris Recycling Deposit Program “where a credit goes to renovators or builders or demolition companies if they can divert and save some of those materials to reuse. They get a credit back. This was a big program implemented by the town, but it hasn’t been used a whole lot yet, we’re working on the outreach part,” explained Haney.

The town is also working on a community solar garden that Haney hopes will lead to more businesses installing solar panels. Nederland is also transitioning to electric vehicles and is on a waitlist to get an all-electric Ford Lightning truck, which Haney doesn’t believe many mountain towns have. The town will also be adding more EV chargers to accommodate tourists from neighboring Denver as well as locals who wish to make the switch.

Haney was pleasantly surprised that sustainability initiatives were not a hard sell. Local food production is a high priority for many, and building up a community greenhouse and farmers market are a common goal.

What’s challenging in a town of this size, according to Haney, is making sustainability a priority in a community with limited human resources, all while maintaining a small town feel — which is the reason people come to visit. “This was a different town 20 years ago,” said Haney. “It will continue to change over time, and we get to help decide what that looks like. One of the benefits of being a small town is that we get to instigate change — probably pretty well — with just having a small community, maybe quicker than a larger municipality.”

Lafayette: Greening community engagement

Lafayette is a small but eclectic and engaged city full of character, and according to its Sustainability Manager Elizabeth Szorad, this willingness of residents to get involved with sustainability is one of its greatest assets. The downtown is culturally vibrant and art focused. Many popular community events are centered around artists and their creativity. Szorad capitalized on this and held a call for artists to create digital art to place on waste containers throughout downtown.

The downtown Lafayette is culturally vibrant and art focused. Many popular community events are centered around artists and their creativity. ? City of Lafayette

“Overall, we have a very great community, very involved,” Szorad said. “They care about our downtown, our neighborhood aspects, and building that community. We’re in a really nice spot in terms of growth.”

Lafayette is subject to a heat island effect, especially in the downtown corridor. A “cool roof” solution of shade provided by trees to mitigate this effect is one effort that will be proposed at a Lafayette City Council soon. Szorad said they’re at the beginning stages of analysis to determine how to make the city more resilient against the effects of extreme heat. “Can we find trees to provide shade in our downtown?” Szorad asked. “That comes into the conversation about water conservation — how much water would that need? Do we have enough water to grow the trees necessary to produce shade?”

The heat island effect

Szorad has been encouraged by the level of engagement of residents in Lafayette and their willingness to learn how to live more sustainably. She believes the key to implementing sustainability within a community is not a “zero to one hundred” approach but, rather, incremental behavior changes where everyone does their part.

One of Lafayette’s key priorities in “greening” the city has been focused on water conservation. In 2013, Lafayette instituted a permanent water conservation ordinance to protect its resources. The city partnered with local nonprofit Resource Central, offering three programs for residents to conserve water: Lawn Removal Service, Garden in a Box, and Slow the Flow programs are designed to reduce the amount of lawn residents have, replace them with waterwise yards which may include permeable green landscaping or other water-efficient plant material, and evaluate existing outdoor sprinkler systems.

Water conservation projects are top of mind to Szorad: “Due to climate change and earlier snowmelt in general, there’s a greater emphasis on what we’re going to do with our water conservation initiatives. Not only on the policy side — we are looking at different building codes.” The community has xeriscaped facilities that do not require water, such as roadways and medians, and will also be converting a facility in 2023 to be one of the largest demonstration xeriscape gardens in Colorado.

The gardens will be a community gathering space where residents and students can come learn about conservation and wildfire prevention. Lafayette also holds an annual Gas-Powered Mower and Leaf Blower Take Back Event, where residents receive an electric lawn equipment voucher in exchange for the return of their existing gas-powered equipment. This year’s event is taking place on April 22.

“Due to climate change and earlier snowmelt in general, there’s a greater emphasis on what we’re going to do with our water conservation initiatives. Not only on the policy side — we are looking at different building codes.”

“Part of our philosophy is to practice what we preach in sustainability as an organization,” Szorad told YS. “So if we do get calls like, ‘What are you doing about water conservation or recycling?’ We can tell our story to residents, so they understand that this is a priority — and they can look into what resources are available to make those incremental changes,” she explained.

The town is enhancing its sustainability plan by turning it towards a climate action plan. Lafayette will also be introducing a multi-modal transportation plan to include an e-bike rebate program which Szorad says has already been successful in Boulder and Denver. The goal is to change commuters’ transportation mode. In a city of nine square miles with an average trip of three miles, Szorad said that commuting translates very well to e-bike use, even with the addition of cargo. For this initiative, Lafayette is partnering with nearby Louisville. Creating regional partnerships increases the size of sustainability teams, which are usually limited in smaller localities.

Boulder County: A multi-pronged approach

The county refers to itself as a “global leader in climate action,” and the county’s Office of Sustainability, Climate Action & Resilience believes that radical transformation is required to meet the challenges faced by residents impacted by the climate crisis.

YS spoke with Christian Herrmann, the office’s Climate Communications Director. Herrmann said they’re “lucky in terms of being a local government that has a really passionate population that wants governmental action on the climate crisis and sustainability.”

Zach Hedstrom of Boulder Mushroom – ? Boulder County. Office of Sustainability, Climate Action & Resilience

Boulder was one of the first counties in the United States to establish a designated climate action fund to kickstart innovative projects and technologies that fight the climate crisis through carbon dioxide removal. “Instead of just reducing emissions by cutting fossil fuels and reducing pollution, we also believe that’s not enough,” said Herrmann. “We need to start innovating and actively sucking the legacy emissions and carbon dioxide that’s in the atmosphere out of the atmosphere.”

Herrmann points to the Marshall Fire — which was Colorado’s most expensive to date — as an example of the extreme wildfires the Boulder County area is experiencing. The Boulder Watershed Collective, Grama Grass & Livestock, and Boulder Mushroom — a local mycology center — have partnered with assistance from the county’s Climate Innovation Fund to decompose wood chips and inoculate them with mycelium in an effort to help the soil retain moisture and carbon dioxide, thereby making land more resilient and less prone to wildfire.

Herrmann sees the need for communities to partner. Local governments in the western U.S. are pooling resources to remove CO? out of the atmosphere. Four Corners Carbon Coalition, a partnership between Boulder County, Salt Lake City, Santa Fe, and Flagstaff just launched a first round of grants for projects that use removed CO? to produce concrete. Concrete production represents over 7% of all global emissions.

“We need to start innovating and actively sucking the legacy emissions and carbon dioxide that’s in the atmosphere out of the atmosphere.”

“We’ve focused a lot as an organization on agricultural climate solutions,” said Herrmann. “That’s a huge puzzle piece — that local soils and local populations have access to food that’s produced nearby. In addition, farmland, when managed well, can function as carbon sinks.” Carbon sinks are anything natural, such as vegetation, the ocean, or otherwise, that accumulate and store carbon compounds.

BOCO also partnered with Mad Agriculture and the James Beard Award-winning Zero Foodprint to launch Restore Colorado. Restaurants and food businesses can sign up and use 1% of customers’ bills to fund local farms and ranches to support local regenerative and carbon farming practices such as composting and tree planting. Over thirty-two Colorado restaurants and businesses, like Annette, Dry Storage, River and Woods, Somebody People, and all Boulder Subway sandwich locations, are taking part in the program.

The county is also tackling climate change in a more systematic way in the courtroom. The county, along with San Miguel County, filed a lawsuit in 2018 against oil companies Suncor and ExxonMobil demanding that they contribute to the costs associated with climate change, estimated to top $150 million dollars by 2050. The communities are supported by EarthRights International, Hannon Law Firm, and Niskanen Center. The case has been remanded to Colorado state court as of 2020.

The end — and a collectively renewable beginning

Climate activists and organizations have long been sounding the alarm. The Colorado Sierra Club has been advocating for climate change solutions with recommendations from air and water quality to public health, wildlife preservation, and fuel consumption. The social justice and equity component of environmentalism can’t be overstated. The National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences indicates climate change and extreme weather events have a disproportionate burden on vulnerable populations.

“I think that’s what we need to tackle the climate crisis — we need local action.”

“In general, children and pregnant women, older adults, certain occupational groups, persons with disabilities, and persons with chronic medical conditions are more vulnerable to health stressors, such as extreme heat, floods, poor air quality, and other climate-related events,” the report states. The unfortunate reality is that those with less access to resources have less of a way to impact governmental policies despite being the most affected by a changing climate.

Despite this, there’s an appetite in BOCO and North Metro to fight back. Initiatives are often fueled by passion and a willingness to turn the tide and protect the fragile local ecosystems.

“I think that’s what we need to tackle the climate crisis — we need local action,” Herrmann told YS. “We need people to be thinking about their gardens, improving the health of their gardens, and growing their own food … and you also need to be tackling more systemic action to help shift the system where possible.”

We need to be realistic. Oil and gas companies as well as the military — the world’s single largest consumer of oil according to studies by Brown University’s Watson Institute of International and Public Affairs — are the major contributors to greenhouse gas emissions. It’s clear that community initiatives, while laudable, practical, and helpful, will never be enough to stop dangerous emissions from leaking into the atmosphere. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change issued a special report on the impacts of global warming in 2018 with clear conclusions: “Limiting global warming to 1.5ºC would require rapid, far-reaching and unprecedented changes in all aspects of society.” The IPCC’s report indicated that we have 12 years to act decisively. That was five years ago already. Proponents of fracking would like us to believe the economic effects of halting fossil fuel extraction would be dire. This ignores the extreme costs of disaster event-related losses — $2.97 trillion over the past two decades according to the United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction: “While better recording and reporting may partly explain some of the increase in events, much of it is due to a significant rise in the number of climate-related disasters. Between 2000 and 2019, there were 510,837 deaths and 3.9 billion people affected by 6,681 climate-related disasters. This compares with 3,656 climate-related events which accounted for 995,330 deaths (47% due to drought/ famine) and 3.2 billion affected in the period 1980-1999.”

“We need people to be thinking about their gardens, improving the health of their gardens, and growing their own food … and you also need to be tackling more systemic action to help shift the system where possible.”

Focusing on economic impacts of slowing oil and gas also ignores the growth in the clean technology and energy sectors. Clean energy boosts employment levels. Jobs are expected to expand to 43 million worldwide by 2050. It also reduces consumer costs, is commercially viable, and allows universal access to energy. The industry’s “math” simply does not compute.

Coloradoans want to see change, and as a region disproportionately and disastrously affected by the climate crisis, they’re taking initiative and holding their representatives to task. No one is naive here. Residents know that systemic global change is needed to truly halt the effects of the climate crisis.

Even faced with these sobering facts, small changes do make an impact, and local communities are bringing awareness to the severe and devastating effects of climate change to our environment. Our ecosystem depends on it, and thereby so do we.

The post The Power of Local Action: How Municipalities Are Making a Difference in Sustainability Efforts appeared first on Yellow Scene Magazine.